RETARGET
Data & Benchmarks March 17, 2026 Last updated: March 2026

RETARGETING
STATISTICS 2026

80+ up-to-date retargeting benchmarks, costs, and trends. From CTR vs cold traffic and conversion uplift to costs by platform, frequency capping, and the impact of cookieless browsing. Compiled from research by Google, Meta, Criteo, eMarketer, Statista, and more.

10x

higher CTR than standard display ads

Source: Criteo Commerce Report 2026

70%

higher conversion rate vs cold traffic

Source: Invesp / WordStream 2026

$0.76

average CPC Google retargeting

Source: Google Ads Benchmark Report 2026

$153B

global retargeting ad spend (2026)

Source: eMarketer / Statista 2026

Retargeting — also known as remarketing — is one of the most effective online advertising strategies in existence. The concept is simple: you show ads to people who have previously interacted with your website, app, or content. But how effective is it really? What are the current costs? And how do performance metrics compare to cold audiences?

On this page, you will find 80+ up-to-date retargeting statistics and benchmarks for 2026, compiled from reports by Google, Meta, Criteo, eMarketer, Statista, and other reputable sources. Whether you want to benchmark your retargeting costs, optimize your Google Ads campaigns, or understand the impact of cookieless browsing: here you will find the data you need.

Retargeting has become essential in the modern marketing funnel. On average, 97% of website visitors leave a site without converting on their first visit. Retargeting gives you the ability to re-engage that 97% with a relevant message — at the right time and through the right channel.

CTR

CTR & CONVERSION VS COLD TRAFFIC

0.7%

average CTR retargeting display

Criteo 2026

0.07%

average CTR standard display

Google Display Benchmarks

3.8%

conversion rate retargeting campaigns

Invesp / WordStream 2026

2.2%

conversion rate non-retargeting

WordStream 2026

CTR COMPARISON: RETARGETING VS COLD TRAFFIC

Retargeting Display Ads 0.70%
Retargeting Social Ads (Meta) 1.20%
Retargeting Search (RLSA) 5.20%
Standard Display Ads (cold) 0.07%
Standard Social Ads (cold) 0.58%

Sources: Criteo Commerce Report 2026, Google Ads Benchmarks, Meta Business Suite 2026

The difference in click-through rate between retargeting and cold traffic is remarkably large. Retargeting display ads achieve an average CTR of 0.7%, which is 10x higher than the 0.07% of standard display ads targeting cold audiences. This difference makes sense: retargeting focuses on people who have already shown interest in your product or service.

With search retargeting — also known as Remarketing Lists for Search Ads (RLSA) — the effect is even stronger. RLSA campaigns achieve an average CTR of 5.2%, compared to 3.8% for regular search ads. That represents an uplift of 37%. Moreover, the average CPC for RLSA is 15-22% lower than for standard search campaigns, because the higher relevance leads to a better Quality Score.

Conversion uplift through retargeting

Not only the CTR but also the conversion rate is significantly higher with retargeting. Retargeting visitors convert an average of 70% more often than new visitors. Specifically, we see the following figures:

  • Retargeting display ads — average conversion rate of 3.8% vs 2.2% for standard display (Invesp 2026)
  • Cart abandonment retargeting — recovers an average of 26% of abandoned shopping carts (Barilliance 2026)
  • Dynamic product retargeting — 34% higher conversion rate than static retargeting ads (Criteo 2026)
  • Email retargeting — open rate of 45.3% vs 20.1% for regular marketing emails (Campaign Monitor 2026)
  • Cross-channel retargeting — 48% higher conversion rate than single-channel retargeting (AdRoll 2026)
  • Video retargeting — 82% higher brand recall and 65% more purchase intent vs standard video ads (Google Internal Data 2026)

The average website visitor visits a site 3-5 times before converting. Retargeting plays directly into this behavior by keeping your brand top-of-mind throughout the decision phase. According to Google research, the likelihood of conversion is 43% higher at the third touchpoint compared to the first.

An important detail is the difference between view-through conversions and click-through conversions in retargeting. Only 32% of retargeting conversions come through a direct click — the remaining 68% are view-through conversions, where someone saw the ad but returned later through a different channel. This makes correct attribution modeling crucial for measuring retargeting effectiveness.

COSTS

RETARGETING COSTS: CPM, CPC & CPA

$5.65

average CPM retargeting display

eMarketer 2026

$0.92

average CPC retargeting (all platforms)

WordStream 2026

$26

average CPA retargeting

AdRoll Benchmark Report 2026

-47%

lower CPA vs cold campaigns

Criteo 2026

COST PER RETARGETING TYPE

Google Display Retargeting (CPC) $0.76
Meta/Facebook Retargeting (CPC) $0.92
Instagram Retargeting (CPC) $1.20
YouTube Retargeting (CPV) $0.09
Search Retargeting / RLSA (CPC) $1.68
LinkedIn Retargeting (CPC) $6.30
Programmatic Retargeting (CPM) $6.95

Sources: Google Ads Benchmarks, Meta Business Suite, LinkedIn Campaign Manager, eMarketer 2026. Costs are US market averages.

Retargeting costs are consistently lower than prospecting campaigns targeting cold audiences. The average CPC for retargeting display ads is $0.76, compared to $1.30-1.95 for prospecting display campaigns. The reason: retargeting audiences are smaller and more relevant, leading to higher Quality Scores and lower auction prices.

The average CPM (cost per 1,000 impressions) for retargeting display ads is $5.65 in 2026. This is 15-25% higher than the CPM for standard display ($4.15-4.80), because retargeting audiences are more valuable and there is more competition to reach these audiences. Despite the higher CPM, retargeting is more cost-efficient due to the significantly higher CTR and conversion rate.

In terms of CPA (cost per acquisition), retargeting performs significantly better. The average CPA for retargeting campaigns is $26, compared to $49 for prospecting campaigns — a difference of 47%. In e-commerce, the gap is even larger: cart abandonment retargeting has an average CPA of $13, while new customer acquisition averages $41.

A common mistake is allocating too much budget to retargeting relative to prospecting. Experts recommend a ratio of 20-30% retargeting and 70-80% prospecting for a healthy funnel. With higher retargeting budgets, you risk oversaturating your audience, leading to rising costs and declining effectiveness. Want to know how to set this up optimally? See our page on outsourcing Google Ads.

PLATFORMS

RETARGETING BY PLATFORM

GOOGLE ADS

CTR (Display) 0.65%
CTR (RLSA) 5.2%
Avg. CPC $0.76
Conversion Rate 3.5%
Reach 90% web

Source: Google Ads Benchmark Report 2026

META ADS

CTR (Feed) 1.20%
CTR (Stories) 0.85%
Avg. CPC $0.92
Conversion Rate 4.1%
Reach 2.1B users

Source: Meta Business Suite Insights 2026

LINKEDIN ADS

CTR (Sponsored Content) 0.52%
CTR (Text Ads) 0.38%
Avg. CPC $6.30
Conversion Rate 2.8%
Reach 1B+ members

Source: LinkedIn Campaign Manager Benchmarks 2026

Google Ads retargeting: the largest reach

Google Ads retargeting via the Google Display Network (GDN) reaches more than 90% of all internet users worldwide through more than 2 million websites and apps. Google offers several retargeting options:

  • Standard remarketing — display ads to previous website visitors, average CTR 0.65%, CPC $0.76
  • Dynamic remarketing — product-specific ads based on viewed items, 28% higher conversion rate than standard remarketing
  • RLSA (Remarketing Lists for Search Ads) — bid adjustments on previous visitors in search results, CTR 5.2%, CPC 15-22% lower
  • Video remarketing — YouTube ads to website visitors or video viewers, average CPV $0.09
  • Customer Match — targeting based on your own customer data (email, phone), match rate 60-80%
  • Performance Max remarketing — automated retargeting across all Google channels, 18% higher ROAS than single-channel

Google's Smart Bidding algorithms automatically optimize bids for retargeting audiences. Campaigns with Smart Bidding and retargeting achieve an average of 23% more conversions at the same CPA compared to manual bidding. Learn more about the options in our overview of Google Ads statistics 2026.

Meta Ads retargeting: the highest conversion rate

Meta (Facebook and Instagram) is the second most popular retargeting platform after Google. Meta's strong suit is the detailed user data that results in the highest average conversion rate among the major platforms: 4.1%. Key Meta retargeting statistics:

  • Custom Audiences — average match rate of 70-85% based on email/phone lists
  • Website Custom Audiences — retargeting via Meta Pixel, average conversion rate 4.1%
  • Dynamic Product Ads (DPA) — 56% lower CPA and 34% higher ROAS compared to static retargeting (Meta Internal Data 2026)
  • Engagement Custom Audiences — retargeting based on video views, form submissions, or Instagram interactions, CTR 1.4%
  • Advantage+ retargeting — Meta's AI-driven retargeting, 22% more efficient CPA than manual audiences (Meta 2026)
  • Conversions API (CAPI) — server-side tracking, improves match rate by 15-30% compared to pixel-only tracking

Meta's Advantage+ campaigns combine prospecting and retargeting in a single campaign, letting the algorithm determine budget allocation. In practice, Advantage+ allocates an average of 35-45% of budget to retargeting audiences, resulting in 19% lower cost per purchase.

LinkedIn Ads retargeting: the highest B2B quality

LinkedIn retargeting is significantly more expensive than Google or Meta but delivers the highest lead quality for B2B companies. LinkedIn retargeting visitors have a 2.5x higher conversion rate than cold LinkedIn audiences. The premium price is justified by:

  • Website Retargeting — via LinkedIn Insight Tag, average CPC $6.30 but conversion rate 2.8%
  • Contact Targeting — upload of email/company lists, match rate 75-90% for business emails
  • Engagement Retargeting — retargeting LinkedIn event attendees, lead form submitters, or video viewers, CTR 0.72%
  • Account-Based Marketing (ABM) — retargeting by company, 3.2x higher engagement rate than regular LinkedIn targeting
  • Average deal size — LinkedIn retargeting leads generate 28% larger deals on average than leads from other channels (LinkedIn B2B Institute 2026)
FREQ

FREQUENCY CAPPING & AD FATIGUE

5-7x

optimal frequency per user per week

Retargeting Best Practices 2026

-45%

CTR decline after 10+ impressions/week

Criteo 2026

54%

of consumers annoyed by excessive retargeting

InSkin Media / Rapp 2026

17d

optimal cookie window (e-commerce)

AdRoll 2026

Frequency capping — limiting the number of times a user sees the same ad — is one of the most underestimated aspects of retargeting. Without proper frequency caps, you risk ad fatigue: the point at which your ads generate irritation instead of interest.

The ideal frequency by campaign type

  • Brand awareness retargeting — 3-5 impressions per user per week is optimal. Higher frequencies lead to less than 2% additional recall (Kantar 2026)
  • Consideration/engagement retargeting — 5-7 impressions per week delivers the best CTR. At 8+, CTR begins to decline (Criteo 2026)
  • Cart abandonment retargeting — up to 10 impressions per week acceptable in the first 48 hours, then scale back to 3-5 (Barilliance 2026)
  • B2B retargeting — lower frequency (2-4 per week) more effective due to longer decision cycles, with creative rotation (LinkedIn B2B Institute 2026)

Regarding timing: retargeting effectiveness drops quickly as more time passes since the last website visit. In the first 24 hours after a visit, the conversion probability is 4.2x higher than after 7 days. After 30 days, the conversion probability is only 12% of day one. The optimal cookie window varies by sector:

  • E-commerce (low value) — 7-14 day cookie window
  • E-commerce (high value) — 14-30 days
  • B2B SaaS — 30-60 days
  • Automotive / real estate — 60-90 days
  • Travel / hospitality — 14-21 days

Creative rotation is another crucial factor. Ads that run unchanged for more than 2 weeks lose an average of 28% of their initial CTR. Best practice is to run at least 3-5 different ad variations and refresh every 10-14 days. Dynamic retargeting ads with personalized product images are an exception: they maintain their effectiveness 40% longer than static banners.

Research by InSkin Media shows that 54% of consumers are annoyed by ads that "follow" them across the internet. At the same time, 25% of the same group say retargeting reminded them of a product they actually wanted to buy. The key is balance: relevant, varied ads with a reasonable frequency.

DEVICES

CROSS-DEVICE RETARGETING

3.6

average number of devices per US consumer

GfK / Google 2026

67%

start purchase on mobile, complete on desktop

Google Consumer Insights 2026

+41%

higher conversion with cross-device retargeting

Criteo Cross-Device Report 2026

38%

of conversions missed without cross-device tracking

Facebook/Meta Internal Data 2026

The average US consumer uses 3.6 devices to browse and shop online. This makes cross-device retargeting essential: if you only retarget on the device where someone visited your site, you miss up to 38% of potential conversions.

The customer journey pattern is clear: 67% of online purchases start on a mobile device but are completed on a desktop or laptop. For B2B, this percentage is even higher (74%). Without cross-device retargeting, you can no longer reach these users after they switch devices.

Cross-device tracking methods and their effectiveness

  • Deterministic matching (logged-in users) — 95%+ accuracy, but limited to 45-55% of users (Google, Meta, Amazon ecosystem)
  • Probabilistic matching — 70-80% accuracy via IP, device fingerprinting, and behavioral patterns, but under pressure from privacy regulations
  • Google Signals — cross-device data from logged-in Google users, covering approximately 78% of US internet users
  • Meta cross-device — via Facebook/Instagram login, reaching 85% of US adults aged 18-65
  • CRM-based retargeting — Customer Match (Google) and Custom Audiences (Meta), 100% accurate for matched users, match rate 60-85%

Cross-device retargeting delivers not only more conversions but also better attribution insights. Advertisers using cross-device tracking report an average of 22% more attributed conversions and a 15% more accurate picture of their actual ROAS. Without cross-device data, mobile advertising in particular is systematically undervalued.

The main challenge for cross-device retargeting in 2026 is privacy compliance. GDPR requires explicit consent for cross-device tracking. In Europe, an average of 42% of website visitors consent to marketing cookies, which directly limits the potential cross-device reach. First-party data strategies and logged-in experiences are therefore becoming increasingly important.

PRIVACY

COOKIELESS IMPACT & FIRST-PARTY DATA

40-60%

retargeting reach loss due to cookie restrictions

eMarketer 2026

78%

of marketers now use first-party data

IAB Europe 2026

52%

have deployed server-side tracking

Simo Ahava / IAB 2026

+30%

better ROAS with first-party data strategy

Boston Consulting Group / Google 2026

The cookieless future is no longer a distant concern — it is the reality of 2026. Safari and Firefox have been blocking third-party cookies since 2020 (together accounting for roughly 30% of the US browser market). Google Chrome has not fully phased out third-party cookies, but the Privacy Sandbox APIs (Topics API, Protected Audiences) are gradually replacing traditional cookie-based retargeting.

Impact on retargeting performance

The direct impact of cookie restrictions on retargeting is significant. Research shows:

  • Reach — traditional cookie-based retargeting reaches 40-60% fewer users than in 2022 (eMarketer 2026)
  • Attribution — 30-45% of conversions are no longer correctly attributed to retargeting campaigns without server-side tracking (Google 2026)
  • CPM increase — retargeting CPMs have risen by an average of 22% due to shrinking but increasingly valuable audiences (Criteo 2026)
  • Consent rates — on average, 42% of European visitors accept marketing cookies (Cookiebot / IAB 2026)
  • iOS impact — Apple's App Tracking Transparency (ATT) has reduced Meta retargeting reach by 35-40% (Meta Q4 2025 Earnings Call)

First-party data as an alternative

Marketers investing in first-party data strategies demonstrably outperform their peers. According to research by Boston Consulting Group and Google, advertisers with a mature first-party data strategy achieve 25-35% better ROAS and 1.5x more revenue growth than advertisers who remain dependent on third-party data.

  • Customer Match (Google) — match rate 60-80%, conversion rate 2x higher than standard retargeting audiences
  • Conversions API (Meta CAPI) — recovers 15-30% of lost conversion data, significantly improves optimization
  • Enhanced Conversions (Google) — improves conversion attribution by 17-25% via hashed first-party data
  • Server-side tagging — 52% of advertisers use server-side tracking, 28% plan implementation in 2026
  • Email-based identity — Unified ID 2.0, LiveRamp RampID, and other solutions growing 140% year-over-year
  • Zero-party data — data that customers consciously share (preferences, surveys), 2.4x higher engagement than inferred data

The transition to a cookieless world is not just a technical challenge but also a strategic opportunity. Companies that are first to build a strong first-party data strategy create a competitive advantage that is difficult to replicate. Want to know how to approach this? Our AI marketing agency helps businesses with the transition to privacy-proof retargeting.

ROI

ROI & ROAS BENCHMARKS

5:1

average ROAS retargeting (e-commerce)

Criteo 2026

3.2:1

average ROAS retargeting (all sectors)

AdRoll 2026

+160%

higher ROAS vs prospecting campaigns

WordStream 2026

68%

of marketers call retargeting their most profitable channel

IAB / PwC 2026

ROAS BY RETARGETING STRATEGY

Cart Abandonment Retargeting 8.2:1
Dynamic Product Retargeting 6.5:1
Cross-Channel Retargeting 5.1:1
Standard Website Retargeting 3.2:1
Video Retargeting (YouTube) 2.8:1
Email Retargeting 4.4:1
LinkedIn B2B Retargeting 2.4:1

Sources: Criteo Commerce Report 2026, AdRoll Benchmark Report, LinkedIn Campaign Manager, Google Internal Data. ROAS = revenue / ad spend.

The return on ad spend for retargeting consistently outperforms prospecting campaigns. The average ROAS for retargeting across all sectors is 3.2:1 — for every dollar you invest, you receive $3.20 back. For e-commerce, this rises to 5:1, and specifically for cart abandonment retargeting, it reaches 8.2:1.

For comparison: the average ROAS for prospecting display campaigns is only 1.2:1. This makes retargeting an average of 160% more profitable than cold campaigns. Despite this, retargeting accounts for only 15-20% of the average advertising budget — an underinvestment that costs many businesses money.

Retargeting ROI depends heavily on audience segmentation. The best results come from segmented audiences based on behavior:

  • Product viewers — visitors who viewed specific product pages, ROAS 4.8:1
  • Cart abandoners — visitors who added items to cart but did not check out, ROAS 8.2:1
  • Past purchasers — existing customers for upsell/cross-sell, ROAS 5.6:1
  • Homepage bouncers — visitors who only saw the homepage, ROAS 1.4:1
  • Content engagers — visitors who consumed blogs/content, ROAS 2.1:1
  • High-value page visitors — visitors to pricing/demo pages, ROAS 6.8:1

The difference between the best and worst audience segments is a factor of 6 in ROAS. This underscores the importance of granular audience building rather than treating all visitors the same. Check out the conversion optimization statistics for additional data on how to optimally convert these audiences.

INDUSTRY

RETARGETING BY INDUSTRY

RETARGETING CONVERSION RATE BY INDUSTRY

Automotive 5.4%
Financial Services 4.8%
Travel & Hospitality 4.3%
E-commerce (Fashion) 3.9%
B2B / SaaS 3.4%
E-commerce (Electronics) 3.1%
Education & Training 2.9%
Healthcare 2.7%
Real Estate 2.4%

Sources: Criteo Industry Benchmarks 2026, AdRoll Benchmark Report, WordStream. Conversion rate = percentage of retargeting clicks that lead to a conversion.

Retargeting effectiveness varies significantly by industry. Automotive performs best with an average retargeting conversion rate of 5.4%, followed by financial services (4.8%) and travel (4.3%). The high scores in automotive are explained by the long consideration phase: car buyers visit an average of 7-12 websites before making a decision.

The average retargeting ROAS by industry shows a similar pattern:

  • E-commerce fashion — ROAS 6.2:1, CPC $0.60, cart abandonment rate 74%
  • E-commerce electronics — ROAS 4.8:1, CPC $0.89, average decision time 12 days
  • Travel & hospitality — ROAS 5.5:1, CPC $0.74, seasonality makes timing crucial
  • Automotive — ROAS 3.8:1, CPC $1.36, longest retargeting window (60-90 days)
  • B2B / SaaS — ROAS 2.8:1, CPC $2.60, but highest average deal value ($9,200+)
  • Financial services — ROAS 3.5:1, CPC $3.37, strict compliance requirements for ad content
  • Education & training — ROAS 4.1:1, CPC $1.03, seasonal peaks around enrollment periods
  • Healthcare — ROAS 2.2:1, CPC $2.01, limitations from medical advertising regulations
  • Real estate — ROAS 2.6:1, CPC $2.39, long sales cycle (3-6 months on average)

A striking finding: in e-commerce fashion, an average of 74% of shopping carts are abandoned. Cart abandonment retargeting recovers 26% of these, making it one of the most profitable advertising investments in the entire digital marketing mix. The average order value of a recovered cart is also 12% higher than for direct purchases, likely because the retargeting ad creates an additional decision moment.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

1

10x higher CTR than cold traffic

Retargeting display ads achieve 0.7% CTR vs 0.07% for cold display. For search (RLSA), the uplift is 37%. The difference is consistent across all platforms.

2

47% lower cost per acquisition

Retargeting CPA ($26) is nearly half of prospecting CPA ($49). Cart abandonment retargeting scores as low as $13 CPA. The cost efficiency is unmatched.

3

Frequency capping is crucial

5-7 impressions per week is optimal. After 10+, CTR drops by 45% and 54% of consumers get annoyed. Creative rotation every 10-14 days prevents ad fatigue.

4

First-party data is the future

Cookie restrictions affect 40-60% of retargeting reach. Companies with mature first-party data achieve 25-35% better ROAS. Server-side tracking is growing 180%.

5

Platform choice depends on your goal

Google for reach (90% web), Meta for conversion (4.1% CR), LinkedIn for B2B lead quality (2.5x higher conversion vs cold). A multi-platform mix is optimal.

6

AI is transforming retargeting

61% already use predictive retargeting, 92% plan more AI deployment. AI-personalized ads achieve 22% higher CTR. Manual optimization alone is no longer enough.

METHODOLOGY & SOURCES

The statistics on this page are compiled from publicly available research reports and platform data from reputable organizations. We regularly update this page with the latest data. Key sources include:

Disclaimer: Figures are sourced from the most recent available editions of the cited reports. Some statistics represent preliminary results or estimates. Retargeting performance varies significantly by industry, audience quality, creative, frequency, and platform. For specific advice on your situation, contact our AI marketing agency.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the average CTR of retargeting ads?

The average CTR of retargeting display ads in 2026 is 0.7%, which is 10x higher than the 0.07% of standard display ads. For search retargeting (RLSA), the average CTR is 5.2% — 37% higher than regular search ads. Meta retargeting ads in the feed achieve an average CTR of 1.2%. The exact CTR depends on the platform, industry, and how recent the website visit was. Want to optimize your retargeting? Learn more about outsourcing Google Ads.

How much does retargeting cost per click or per 1,000 impressions?

The average CPM for retargeting display ads is $5.65 in 2026. The average CPC varies by platform: Google Display retargeting costs $0.76 per click, Meta retargeting $0.92, Instagram $1.20, and LinkedIn retargeting $6.30. RLSA (search retargeting) averages $1.68 per click but is 15-22% cheaper than regular search ads thanks to higher relevance. Check out the Google Ads statistics for more cost data.

How much higher is the conversion rate for retargeting compared to cold traffic?

Retargeting visitors convert an average of 70% more often than cold traffic. The average conversion rate is 3.8% for retargeting vs 2.2% for non-retargeting campaigns. With cart abandonment retargeting, the uplift can reach 150%. Dynamic product ads convert 34% better than static retargeting. Read our conversion optimization statistics for more benchmarks.

What is the ideal frequency cap for retargeting?

The optimal frequency cap is 5-7 impressions per user per week for most campaign types. After 10+ impressions per week, CTR drops by an average of 45% due to ad fatigue. For brand awareness, 3-5 per week is sufficient; for cart abandonment, up to 10 per week is acceptable in the first 48 hours. B2B retargeting works best with 2-4 impressions per week due to the longer decision cycle. Rotate creatives every 10-14 days to prevent banner blindness.

What is the impact of third-party cookie deprecation on retargeting?

Cookie restrictions affect 40-60% of traditional retargeting reach. Safari and Firefox already fully block third-party cookies (roughly 30% of the US browser market). As an alternative, 78% of marketers now use first-party data and 52% have implemented server-side tracking. Advertisers with a mature first-party data strategy achieve 25-35% better ROAS. Want to future-proof your retargeting? Our AI marketing agency helps with the transition.

Which platform is best for retargeting: Google, Meta, or LinkedIn?

Each platform has its strengths. Google offers the largest reach (90% of internet users) and the lowest CPC ($0.76). Meta scores best on conversion rate (4.1%) thanks to detailed targeting and dynamic ads. LinkedIn is the most expensive ($6.30 CPC) but delivers the highest lead quality for B2B, with a 2.5x higher conversion rate than cold LinkedIn ads. The optimal strategy is cross-platform retargeting: companies that combine 2+ platforms achieve 48% higher conversion rates.

Retargeting Expertise from Searchlab.nl

At Searchlab.nl, we do not just analyze retargeting statistics — we apply them daily. With 50+ proprietary AI tools and 10 years of experience in online advertising, we optimize retargeting campaigns for businesses across the Netherlands. Our AI software analyzes audience segments, frequency caps, and cross-device patterns to maximize the return on your retargeting budget.

Want to know how your retargeting campaigns compare to these benchmarks? Request a free audit or learn more about how we combine conversion optimization with smart retargeting strategies.

ROAS

OUTSOURCE YOUR RETARGETING?

At Searchlab, we combine 10 years of online advertising expertise with proprietary AI software for better retargeting results at lower costs. Discover what we can do for your campaigns.

Back to Outsource Google Ads
Ruud ten Have

Compiled by

Ruud ten Have

Ruud is a digital marketer with 10+ years of experience in online advertising and AI implementation. At Searchlab, he combines strategic thinking with hands-on AI tooling to deliver measurable results for businesses.